A 9/11 Truther’s perspective on the economy

March 19, 2009

Here’s a recently created satirical youtube video on the economy by someone who doesn’t buy the official explanation of what happened on 9/11. The video has been linked to on whatreallyhappened as well as elsewhere, so I thought some of my blog readers might like to check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHM7_oZJwoc


U.S. economy officially in recession, but white truffle still worth more than weight in gold

December 2, 2008

The DJIA tanked today on the surpising (sarc) news that the US economy has officially been in recession for the past year. BIG surprise there, right? Shocking, unexpected news which deserves to send the Dow plummeting. But, a white truffle which weighs in at just a bit over a kilo (that would be 2.205 lbs, American readers) is still worth $200,000 in a charity auction. I just hope the charity is a good one, like bailing out the US economy, for instance. Then again, 200K wouldn’t even qualify as a drop in the bucket, so I guess Stanley Ho may as well eat high on the Ho(g). Heigh Ho, Heigh Ho, it’s off to hunt truffles I go…

$200,000 white truffle bought at charity auction by Stanley Ho

$200,000 white truffle bought at charity auction by Stanley Ho



“Help is on the way”- to the tune of $8.5 Trillion (and counting) for bailouts

November 27, 2008

Obama reassures nervous nation on ailing economy “”Help is on the way,” he proclaimed at his third news briefing on the economy this week.”
Yes, indeed. $8.5 Trillion dollars worth of help, so far… with no end in sight (or apparently, oversight). That’s according to recent calculations by Bloomberg and Kathleen Pender. The well not only gets deeper, but someone appears to be throwing dirt back in on top of the American public well diggers… a few months back former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill called the bank rescue plan “crazy” and “lunacy”. I wonder what he thinks of the tab that’s been run up at this point.


Now showing- Peter Joseph’s Zeitgeist the movie sequel- Zeitgeist addendum

October 6, 2008

I’m right now watching the newly released feature length sequel to Zeitgeist: the movie- Zeitgeist addendum. Here’s a link and embed where you can watch along. So far, it appears to be mostly about the economic issues covered in part 3 of zeitgeist in more detail, but I’m not too far into it yet.

The Venus Project and its founder, Jacque Fresco, feature fairly prominently in the second half of the movie, so you might want to give their site a visit.

spoiler alert:

my gist notes/quotes from the end solutions below-

Actions for social transformation:

1.) expose the banking fraud (Fed Cartel)
boycott Citibank, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America

2.) boycott the news networks
CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, etc.
use and protect the internet

3.) boycott the military

4.) boycott the energy companies
get off the grid and make your home and car self sustainable

5.) reject the political system
focus on working to dissolve the outdated system of Politics, in favor of technological redesign

6.) create critical mass

thezeitgeistmovement.com


A letter from Dennis Kucinich on the bailout and the economics of fractional reserve lending

October 1, 2008

I’ve bolded the part of the letter which nails the fractional reserve lending scam… not really news to anyone who paid attention to part 3 of Zeitgeist, but pretty succinct nonetheless.

The Bailout and What’s Next

Dear Friend,

Yesterday marked a day that will go down in history, when Congressional Democrats and Republicans alike took on full responsibility to protect the interests of taxpaying Americans, and defeated the deceptive bail out bill, defying the dictates of the Administration, the House Majority Leadership, the House Minority Leadership and the special interests on Wall Street.

Obviously Congress must consider quickly another course. There are immediate issues which demand attention and responsible action by the Congress so that the taxpayers, their assets, and their futures are protected.

We MUST do something to protect millions of Americans whose homes, bank deposits, investments, and pensions are at risk in a financial system that has become seriously corrupted. We are told that we must stabilize markets in order for the people to be protected. I think we need to protect peoples’ homes, bank deposits, investments, and pensions, to order to stabilize the market.

We cannot delay taking action. But the action must benefit all Americans, not just a privileged few. Otherwise, more plans will fail, and the financial security of everyone will be at risk.

The $700 billion bailout would have added to our existing unbearable load of national debt, trade deficits, and the cost of paying for the war. It would have been a disaster for the American public and the government for decades and maybe even centuries to come.

To be sure, there are many different reasons why people voted against the bailout. The legislation did not regard in any meaningful way the plight of millions of Americans who are about to lose their homes. It did nothing to strengthen existing regulatory structures or impose new ones at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve in order to protect investors. There were no direct protections for bank depositors. There was nothing to stop further speculation, which is what brought us into this mess in the first place.

This was a bailout for some firms (and investors) on Wall Street, with the idea that in doing so there would be certain, unspecified, general benefits to the economy.

This is a perfect time to open a broader discussion about our financial system, especially our monetary system. Such a discussion is like searching for a needle in a haystack, and then, upon finding it, discussing its qualities at great length. Let me briefly describe the haystack instead.

Here is a very quick explanation of the $700 billion bailout within the context of the mechanics of our monetary and banking system:

The taxpayers loan money to the banks. But the taxpayers do not have the money. So we have to borrow it from the banks to give it back to the banks. But the banks do not have the money to loan to the government. So they create it into existence (through a mechanism called fractional reserve) and then loan it to us, at interest, so we can then give it back to them.

Confused?

This is the system. This is the standard mechanism used to expand the money supply on a daily basis not a special one designed only for the “$700 billion” transaction. People will explain this to you in many different ways, but this is what it comes down to.

The banks needed Congress’ approval. Of course in this topsy turvy world, it is the banks which set the terms of the money they are borrowing from the taxpayers. And what do we get for this transaction? Long term debt enslavement of our country. We get to pay back to the banks trillions of dollars ($700 billion with compounded interest) and the banks give us their bad debt which they cull from everywhere in the world.

Who could turn down a deal like this? I did.

The globalization of the debt puts the United States in the position that in order to repay the money that we borrow from the banks (for the banks) we could be forced to accept International Monetary Fund dictates which involve cutting health, social security benefits and all other social spending in addition to reducing wages and exploiting our natural resources. This inevitably leads to a loss of economic, social and political freedom.

Under the failed $700 billion bailout plan, Wall Street’s profits are Wall Street’s profits and Wall Street’s losses are the taxpayers’ losses. Profits are capitalized. Losses are socialized.

We are at a teachable moment on matters of money and finance. In the coming days and weeks, I will share with you thoughts about what can be done to take us not just in a new direction, but in a new direction which is just.

Thank you,

Dennis
www.Kucinich.us
216-252-9000 877-933-6647

PS Watch the 47 minute ‘Money as Debt’ animated documentary in http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279. This is a useful, though by no means definitive, introduction to the topic of debt and the monetary system. Let me know what you think.

Okay, just answer me this: gotten anything similar from the McBama campaigns?