site:bradblog dot com search Sibel+Edmonds+bradblog: g*ogle- 10th most relevant result; can you say buried?

I know I’d be pissed it it were me: searching using a certain search engine on site:bradblog.com using terms Sibel and Edmonds and bradblog currently yields which story as the 10th most relevant to the query? Yup, you guessed it…

nestled below

www.bradblog.com/?cat=108

www.bradblog.com/?p=2212 and

www.bradblog.com/?p=2498 (among others)

we finally find

www.bradblog.com/index.php?p=5197 at the very bottom of page 1.

Boycott Google- I recommend polymeta.com instead

Not funny. You know what to do, right?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 8th, 2007 at 11:18 am and is filed under Brad Blog, Google, Sibel Edmonds, censorship, link relevance suppression, relevant link suppression. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “site:bradblog dot com search Sibel+Edmonds+bradblog: g*ogle- 10th most relevant result; can you say buried?”

  1. vitorbal Says:
    November 21, 2007 at 1:08 pm | Reply

    you can’t really be serious about this google thing….. please get your facts straight, lol… something tells me you don’t even have ANY idea at all how their search engine works.. I know the Sibel Edmonds is a big deal but, “boycott Google – I recommend polymeta.com instead” ? give me a break… thats utterly pathetic

  2. wecanchangetheworld Says:
    November 22, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Reply

    Pathetic. Yeah sure, whatever. Stick with Google if you want. I’m happier with Polymeta than I’ve ever been with Google, and I never thought I’d say that about another search engine. When a new highly popular news story is buried at number 10 in relevance below years old stuff, I don’t think I really WANT to know how their search engine works. Thanks just the same.

Leave a Reply